THE IMPACT OF BOARD DIVERSITY AND THE MODERATION EFFECT OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON FREE CASH FLOW

Authors

  • Arfiana Mahdiati Universitas Indonesia
  • Ruslan Prijadi Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32897/techno.2023.16.2.2827

Abstract

In this study, we propose pandemic Covid-19 as moderating effect on the role of board diversity in enhancing the allocation of free cash flow. The board diversity variables are examined using least squares regression for panel data by exploiting the variables to board gender diversity, board member affiliation, board specific skills, and board size variables for an observation of 279 Indonesian listed firms over the period 2015–2021. We found that the presence of female gender on the board, the presence of board members who have either an industry specific background or a strong financial background, and enough board members deter the opportunistic conduct of managers and likely to reduce excess funds through dividend pay-outs. The results demonstrate that a diverse board reduces agency conflicts and enhances resource allocation supporting governance practices. During the Covid-19 pandemic, the presence of female gender in the board, the presence of boards member with other corporate affiliations, and the adequacy of board size proved to provide more effective supervision of the company's cash flow allocation. The findings are beneficial to policymakers since this explains the significance of implementing measures to enhance the efficacy of the board's role by instituting a diversity requirement.

Author Biographies

Arfiana Mahdiati, Universitas Indonesia

Master of Management Universitas Indonesia

Ruslan Prijadi, Universitas Indonesia

Master of Management Universitas Indonesia

References

He Z, Suardi S, Wang K, Zhao Y. Firms’ COVID-19 Pandemic Exposure and Corporate Cash Policy: Evidence from China. Econ Model. :116.

Guizani M, Gaafar A. Board gender diversity, financial decisions and free cash flow: empirical evidence from Malaysia. Management Research Review. 45(2):198–216.

Jurkus AF, Park JC, Woodard LS. Women in top management and agency costs. J Bus Research. 64(2):180–6.

Zaid MAA, Wang M, Abuhijleh STF, Issa A, Saleh MWA, Ali F. Corporate governance practices and Capital structure decisions: the moderating effect of gender diversity. Corporate Governance: Intl J Bus Soc. 20(5):939–64.

Yeo HJ. Role of free cash flows in making investment and dividend decisions: the case of the shipping industry. Asian J Shipping and Logistics. 34(2):113–8.

Buallay A, Hamdan R, Barone E, Hamdan A. Increasing female participation on boards: Effects on sustainability reporting. International J Fin Econ [Internet]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2141

UlAin Q, Yuan X, Javaid HM, Usman M, Haris M. Female directors and agency costs: evidence from chinese listed firms. Intl J Emerging Markets [Internet]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-10-2019-0818

Saptarina A. Capital Market Women Empowerment Forum. In: meeting of the Indonesian Financial Services.

Singh G, Kaur S. Impact of covid - 19 on corporate governance constitution and firm performance in the indian banking sector. SCMS J Indian Mana. 19(3):112–23.

Shen H, Fu M, Pan H, Yu Z, Chen Y. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Firm Performance. Emerging Markets Fina Trade. 56(10):2213–30.

Albuquerque R, Koskinen Y, Yang S, Zhang C. Resiliency of environmental and social stocks: An analysis of the exogenous COVID-19 market crash. The Review Corporate Fin Studies. 9(3):621.

Ren Z, Zhang X, Zhang Z. New evidence on COVID-19 and firm performance. Econ Anal Policy [Internet]. 72:213–25. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.08.002

O.E.C.D. Responding to Covid-19: The rules of good governance apply now forever [Internet]. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/governance/public-governance-responses-to-covid19/

Cooper DR, Pamela SS. Business Research Methods. 12th ed. New York, N.Y: McGraw- Hill/Irwin;

Siciliano JI. The relationship of board member diversity to organizational performance. JBE. 15(12):1313–20.

Hillman AJ, Paetzold RL, Cannella AA. The Resource Dependence Role of Corporate Directors: Strategic Adaption of Board Composition in Response to Environmental Change. J Man Studies.

Boone AL, Field LC, Karpoff JM, Raheja CG. The determinants of corporate board size and composition: an empirical analysis”. J Financ Econ. 85:66–101.

Setiaatmaja LY. Does board size really matter? Evidence from Australia. Gadjah Mada Intl J Bus. 10(3):331–52.

Xu J, Jin Z. Exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on firms’ financial performance and cash holding: New evidence from China’s agri-food sector. Agronomy. 12(8):1951.

Rusmin AEW, B H. The impact of surplus free cash flow and audit quality on earnings management:The case of growth triangle countries. Asian Review of Accounting. 22(3):217–32.

Benkraiem R, Hamrouni A, Lakhal F, Toumi N. Board independence, gender diversity and CEO compensation”. Corporate Governance: Intl J Bus Soc. 17(5):845–60.

Carter DA, Simkins BJ, Simpson WG. Corporate governance, board diversity and firm value. The Financial Review. 38(1):33–53.

Almeida TA, Morais CRF, Coelho AC. Gender diversity, governance and dividend policy in Brazil. Revista de Gestão. 27(2):189–205.

Adams RB, Ferreira D. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J Fin Econ. 94(2):291–309.

Bernile G, Bhagwat V, Yonker S. Board diversity, firm risk, and corporate policies. J Fin Econ. 127(3):588–612.

Al-Najjar B, Clark E. Corporate Governance and Cash Holding in MENA. Intl Bus Fin. 2016;39.

Jensen MC. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review. 76(2):323–9.

Guizani M. The mediating effect of dividend payout on the relationship between internal governance and free cash flow. Intl J Bus Soc. 18(4):748–70.

Benjamin SJ, Biswas P. Board gender composition, dividend policy and COD: the implications of CEO duality. Accounting Research J. 32(3):454–76.

Hillman AJ, Dalziel T. Boards of directors and firm performance: integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review. 28(3):383–96.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-31