INOVASI STRATEGI BISNIS PEMBIAYAAN LEASING PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 18/PUU-XVII/2019 DAN NOMOR 2/PUU-XIX/2021

Authors

  • Sriyati Sriyati Fakultas Hukum, Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Hari Purwadi Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Muhammad Rustamaji Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32897/sobat.2023.5.0.3086

Abstract

The Constitutional Court's decision has degraded the executive power of fiduciary guarantees so that the creditor's position no longer has legal certainty. This research examines and analyzes innovation in financing business strategies after Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 and Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021. The conceptual approach is used in this research, which is legal research with a perspective. Deductive syllogism is used as a technique for analyzing primary and secondary legal materials as well as data that can be collected through literature study. The results of this research show that financing agreements, especially leasing, have been proven not to fulfill one of the elements of the requirements for the validity of the agreement because they violate the law so they are null and void, the Constitutional Court's decision degrades the executorial power of the fiduciary guarantee certificate so that the creditor's position no longer has legal certainty, based on the principle Freedom of contract is a business strategy that can provide legal certainty for creditors.

References

Harjito A. Leasing sebagai Alternatif Sumber Pembiayaan Perusahaan. Unisia. 1991;12(11):83–90.

Fransiska. Law , Development & Justice Review Perjanjian Sewa Guna Usaha ( Leasing ) Law , Development & Justice Review. 2021;(1169):171–82.

Soegianto D, R S DS, Junaidi M. Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Kajian Undang- Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia. J Ius Const. 2019;4(2):191.

Mahendra L, Murni RAR, Sumertayasa PGA. Perlindungan Hak-Hak Kreditur Dalam Hal Adanya Pengalihan Benda Jaminan Oleh Pihak Debitur. Acta Com. 2016;267–80.

Dinata AW. Lembaga Jaminan Fidusia: Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Nagari Law Rev. 2020;3(2):84.

UUJF. Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Jdih. 1999;(1):1–5.

Djagardo L, Lumban N. PUU Nomor 2/PUU-XIX/2021 Tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. 2021;(November 2020).

Riskawati S. Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Acta Djurnal. 2021;5(1):33–48.

I Ketut Tjukup1, I Wayan Bela Siki Layang2 NAM, I Ketut Markel ing4, Nyoman Satyayudha Dananjaya5, I Putu Rasmadi Arsha Putra6, Komang Widiana Purnawan 7, Made Diah Sekar Mayang Sari 8 KNP 9 dan PAR ih T 10. Akta Notaris (Akta Otentik) sebagai alat bukti dalam peristiwa hukum perdata. 2016;2:15–2016.

Sari ST. Tinjauan Hubungan Hukum Perjanjian Leasing Kendaraan Bermotor. Priv Law [Internet]. 2021;9 Nomor 1:195. Available from: https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/privatelaw/article/viewFile/28762/pdf

Downloads

Published

2023-12-09

Issue

Section

Articles