KONSENTRASI PASAR AUDIT DAN LITIGATION RISK TERHADAP KUALITAS AUDIT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32897/jsikap.v5i1.331Keywords:
Konsentrasi Pasar Audit, Litigation Risk, Kualitas AuditAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh dari adanya konsentrasi pasar audit dan litigation risk terhadap kualitas audit. metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kausal verifikatif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Variabel dependen dalam penelitian ini adalah kualitas audit yang diukur dengan menggunakan proksi accruals disceretionary. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah perusahaan non keuangan yang listing di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2014-2016. Pemilihan sampel adalah dengan menggunakan purposive sampling. Alat analisis dalam penelitian ini adalah dengan menggunakan analisis regresi linier berganda. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa konsentrasi pasar audit berpengaruh positif terhadap kualitas audit namun tidak signifikan. Sementara litigation risk memperkuat pengaruh positif konsentrasi pasar audit terhadap kualitas audit meskipun tidak signifikan
References
Afriansyah, Z., Siregar, S. V. N. P. (2007). Konsentrasi Pasar Audit di Indonesia (Analisis Empiris di Pasar Modal Indoensia). Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X Universitas Hasanuddin Makassar, 1–27.
Anggraita, V., Fitriany, Aulia, S., & Aryawati. (2016). Pengaruh persaingan pasar jasa audit terhadap kualitas audit …, VII(1), 23–34.
Apandi, R. N. N. (2016). Pengaruh Penerapan Fair Value Non Current Asset Dan Manajemen Pajak Atas Asset Perusahaan Terhadap Fee Audit. JURNAL RISET AKUNTANSI DAN KEUANGAN, 4(3), 1229–1242. https://doi.org/10.17509/jrak.v4i3.5839.
Apandi, R. N. N. (2018). Audit Tenure and Investor â€TM s Perception on Audit Quality Before and After Implementation of The SA 240, 9(2), 128–138.
Apandi, R. N. N., & Sofia, A. (2018). Analysis of Public Accouunting Firm Services and Audit Quality With Structure Conduct Performance Approach In Indonesia Capital maerket. Paperwork In UPI.
Apandi, R. N. N., Utama, S., & Rosieta, H. (2016). The Effect of Corporate Tax Governance, Audit Quality and Tax Exposure on Audit Fee for Companies Enlisted in Indonesia Stock Exchange, Working Paper. Universitas Indonesia. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 15, Working Paper Universitas Indonesia.
Beattie, V., Goodacre, A., Fearnley, S. (2003). And then there were four : A study of UK audit market concentration — causes , consequences and the scope for market adjustment.
Boone, J. P., Khurana, I. K., & Raman, K. K. (2012). Audit Market Concentration and Auditor Tolerance for Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(4), 1171–1203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01144.x.
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1.
Eshleman, J. D. (2013). the Effect of Audit Market Concentration on Audit Pricing and Audit Quality : the Role of the Size of the Audit Market, (December).
Francis, J. R. (2011). A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing, 30(2), 125–152. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50006.
Francis, J. R., Michas, P. N., & Seavey, S. E. (2013). Does audit market concentration harm the quality of audited earnings? Evidence from audit markets in 42 countries. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(1), 325–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2012.01156.x.
Francis, J. R., & Wang, D. (2008). The joint effect of investor protection and big 4 audits on earnings quality around the world. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1506/car.25.1.6.
GAO. (2008). AUDITS OF PUBLIC Continued Concentration in Audit Market for Large Public Companies Does Not Call for Immediate Action. General Accounting Office, (January), 1–120.
Juanda, A. (2009). Risiko Litigasi Pada Perusahaan Go Publik Di Indonesia. Humanity, 5(1), 1–11.
Kallapur, S., Sankaraguruswamy, S., & Zang, Y. (2010). Audit Market Concentration and Audit Quality. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1546356.
Lennartz, C., Haffner, M., Oxley, M. (2012). Competition Between Social and Market Renting: A Theoritical Application of the Structure-conduct-performance Paradigm. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-012-9276-7.
Lin, Z. J., & Chen, F. (2004). “ Expectation Gap ” in The People ’ s Republic of China. International Journal of Auditing, 8, 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2004.00084.x.
Machmud, A. (2014). Struktur Industri Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia. QE Journal, 3(2), 106–125.
Newton, N. J., Wang, D., & Wilkins, M. S. (2013). Does a lack of choice lead to lower quality? evidence from auditor competition and client restatements. Auditing, 32(3), 31–67. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50461.
Nindita, C., & Siregar, S. V. (2013). Analisis Pengaruh Ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik Terhadap Kualitas Audit di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 14(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.9744/jak.14.2.91-104.
Ningsih, R. D., & Ariani, N. E. (2016). Pengaruh Asimetri Informasi, Pengungkapan Modal Intelektual, dan Kualitas Audit Terhadap Biaya Modal Ekuitas. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi, 1(1), 149–157.
PCAOB. (2017). Order Instituting Disciplinary Proceedings, Making Findings, And Imposing Sanctions In the Matter of KAP.
Purwantono, Sungkoro & Surja, Roy Iman Wirahardja, and James Randall Leali. Pcaob, PCAOB Rele(202), 1–24.
Sadeli, D., Apandi, R. N. N., & Caesarriani, R. M. (2013). Pengaruh Audit Tenure Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting Dengan Pendekatan Akrual Diskresioner, 1(1), 8–22.
Siregar, S. V. N. P., Amarullah, F., Wibowo, A. & Anggraita, V. (2011). Rotasi dan Kualitas Audit: Evaluasi Atas Kebijakan Menteri Keuangan KMK No. 423/KMK.6/2002 tentang Jawa Akuntan Publik. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 8(1), 1-17. https:doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2011.01.
Sun, J., & Liu, G. (2011). Client-specific litigation risk and audit quality differentiation. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26, 300–316. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901111124639.
Suryandari, E., & Priyanto, R. E. (2012). KONSERVATISME AKUNTANSI Erni Suryandari & Rangga Eka Priyanto, 12(2), 161–174.
Velte, P., & Stiglbauer, M. (2012). Audit Market Concentration and Its Influence on Audit Quality. International Business Research, 5(11), 146–161. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v5n11p146.
Watkins, A. L., Hillison, W., & Morecroft, S. E. (2004). Audit Quality : A Synthesis of Theory and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Accounting Literature, 153–193.
Xu, H. H. K. (2017). Differential Effects of Market Concentration on Oligopolistic and Atomistic Segments : Evidence of Audit Fees and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 17(3), 121–136.
Zulhaimi, H., & Apandi, R. N. N. (2014). THE VALUE RELEVANCE OF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARD IMPLEMENTATION AND AUDIT QUALITY. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 3(3), 851–862
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish their articles in Jurnal Sistem Informasi, Keuangan, Auditing & Perpajakan (SIKAP) agree to the following terms:
(1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internasional (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
(2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
(3) The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
