FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI MANAJEMEN LABA DAN DAMPAKNYA TERHADAP KOEFISIEN RESPON LABA
Main Article Content
Abstract
Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh suatu pandangan bahwa manajemen perusahaan yang bersifat oportunistik cenderung untuk melakukan manipulasi terhadap kinerjanya dengan melakukan manajemen laba sehingga akan menimbulkan konflik kepentingan dan asimetri informasi yang nantinya akan berdampak terhadap reaksi pasar. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh ukuran kantor akuntan publik dan masa perikatan audit terhadap manajemen laba dan implikasinya terhadap koefisien respon laba. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif dan verifikatif. Adapun teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan adalah teknik purposive sampling, sehingga diperoleh sampel dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 88 perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada tahun 2011-2016. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ukuran kantor akuntan publik berpengaruh negatif secara signifikan terhadap manajemen laba, masa perikatan audit berpengaruh secara negatif signifikan terhadap manajemen laba, manajemen laba berpengaruh secara negatif signifikan terhadap koefisien respon laba, ukuran kantor akuntan publik berpengaruh positif secara signifikan terhadap koefisien respon laba sedangkan masa perikatan audit berpengaruh negatif secara signifikan terhadap koefisien respon laba.
Article Details
Authors who publish their articles in Jurnal Sistem Informasi, Keuangan, Auditing & Perpajakan (SIKAP) agree to the following terms:
(1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internasional (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
(2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
(3) The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Arens, Alvin A. Elder, Randal J. Beasley, Mark S. 2012. Auditing And Assurance Service An Integrated Approach, 14th Global Edition. New Jersey: Printice Hall.
Balsam, S., J. Krishnan, Dan J.S. Yang. 2003. Auditor Industry Specialization And Earnings Quality. Auditing: A Journal Of Practice & Theory 22 (2): 71–97.
Bradbury, M. E., Mak, Y. T. dan Tan, S. M. 2004. Board Characteristics, Audit Committee Characteristics And Abnormal Accruals, Working Paper, Unitec New Zealand dan National University of Singapore.
Belkaoui, Ahmed Riahi, 2007. Teori Akuntansi. Buku Dua. Edisi Kelima. Terjemahan Ali Akbar Yulianto, Risnawati Dermauli, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
Choi, Jong-Hag,. Chansog Kim, Jeong-Bon Kim Dan Yoonseok Zang. 2010. Audit Offize Size, Audit Quality, And Audit Pricing. Auditing: A Journal Of Practice And Theory Vol 29 No.1: 73-97.
Feltham, Gerald A. dan Jinhan Pae. 2000. “Analysis of the Impact of Accounting Accruals on Earnings Uncertainty and Response Coefficients”. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, Vol.2. p. 119-224.
Francis, J. & E. Wilson. 1988. Auditor Changes: A Joint Test Of Theories Relating To Agency Costs And Auditor Differentiation. The Accounting Review 63: 663-682.
Gideon Setyo Budiwitjaksono. 2005. Pengaruh Mekanisme Corporate Governance Terhadap Manajemen Laba Dan Dampaknya Pada Kualitas Laba. Disertasi Program Studi Doktor Ilmu Ekonomi Universitas Padjadjaran. Tidak Dipublikasikan.
Godfrey, Jayne., Hodgson, A., Tarca, A., Hamilton, J. 2010. Accounting Theory. 7th Edition. John Wiley & Son.
Ghosh, A.A. & Moon, D.C. (2005). Auditor Tenure And Perceptions Of Audit Quality. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 585-612.
Hansen C. S, Kumar K.R and Sullivan M.W. 2007. Auditor Capacity Stress And Audit Quality: Market-Based Evidence From Andersen’s Indictment. Journal of Accounting and Economics : 10-49.
Junaidi, Jogiyanto Hartono M., Eko Suwardi, dan Setiyono Miharjo. 2013. Rotasi Semu Dan Tenur KAP Pada Independensi. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XVI. Manado. pp 120-150.
Lin and Mark I. Hwang. 2010. Audit Quality, Corporate Governance, and Earnings Management: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Auditing. Vol. 14: pp.57–77.
Liu, Wei. 2012. Audit Tenure, and Informativeness of Earnings: New Zealand Evidence. Dissertation. Published. AUT University.
Lord, A.T., DeZoort, F.T. 2001. The Impact Of Commitment And Moral Reasoning On Auditors Responses To Social Influence Pressure. Accounting, Organizations And Society, 26, 215-235.
Ma'atoofi, A.R., Yanesari, A.M., Gerayli. 2011. Impact Of Audit Quality On Earnings Management: Evidence From Iran International Research Journal Of Finance And Economics Issue 66. pp 78-84
Rebuilding Public Confidence In Financial Reporting An International Perspective. (2003). International Federation of Accountants
Riyatno. (2007). Pengaruh Ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik Terhadap Earning Response Coefficients. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Bisnis, 5(2), 148-162.
Scott, William. R. 2009. Financial Accounting Theory. 5th Edition. Toronto: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
Sirois, L.-P., & D. A. Simunic. 2011. Auditor Size And Audit Quality Revisited: The Importance Of Audit Technology. Working Paper. HEC Montréal And University Of British Columbia.
Teixeira, Alan M. 2002. Assessing The Impact Of A Change In The Level Of Manager Discretion On The Informativeness Of Earnings. Working Papers. University Of Auckland. September.
Teoh, S.H., & Wong, T.J. 1993. Perceived Auditor Quality And The Earnings Response Coefficient. The Accounting Review, Vol. 68 (2). Pp. 346-366.
Tucker, Jennifer W., Zarowin, Paul. 2006. Does Income Smoothing Improve Earnings Informativeness. The Accounting Review, Vol. 81 (1)