USULAN DESAIN STATUTORY GAAR INDONESIA: STUDI KOMPARATIF TIGA SISTEM HUKUM BERBEDA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32897/jsikap.v6i2.734Keywords:
Penghindaran pajak, General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR), Specific Anti-Avoidance Rule (SAAR), Sistem hukumAbstract
Meskipun Specific Anti-Avoidance Rule (SAAR) menjadi salah satu instrumen dalam mengurangi penghindaran pajak, aturan ini masih menyisakan ruang bagi penghindaran pajak tertentu yang tidak diatur. Oleh karena itu, berbagai negara dengan sistem hukum yang berbeda memberlakukan General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) untuk menangkal aksi penghindaran pajak yang tidak dapat tertangani oleh SAAR. Namun, Indonesia belum menerapkan GAAR sebagai aturan anti penghindaran pajak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengonstruksi usulan desain GAAR yang ideal bagi Indonesia dengan mengkomparasikan implementasi Statutory GAAR pada tiga negara dengan sistem hukum berbeda, yakni Afrika Selatan, Singapura, dan Republik Rakyat Tiongkok. Untuk menjawab pertanyaan ini, metodologi penelitian yang digunakan adalah studi pustaka dan wawancara kepada berbagai pemangku kepentingan, yakni pembuat kebijakan, konsultan pajak, dan akademisi. Analisis tematik digunakan untuk mengolah hasil pengumpulan data menjadi usulan desain Statutory GAAR Indonesia yang terdiri atas empat skema, yaitu skema umum, administrasi, hierarki aturan GAAR dalam peraturan perpajakan, dan kendala pengaplikasian GAAR
References
Alex, C., Garcia-Bernando, J., Palansky, M., & Mansour, M.B. The state of tax justice in the time of Covid-19. Tax Justice Network. https://taxjustice.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/The_State_of_Tax_Justice_2020_ENGLISH.pdf
Arianandini, P. W., & Ramantha, I. W. (2018). Pengaruh profitabilitas, leverage, dan kepemilikan institusional pada tax avoidance. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 22(3), 2088-2116. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2018.v22.i03.p17
Arnold, B. (2008). Essays in honour of John Tiley. Dalam Comparative perspectives on revenue law. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511585951
Bappenas. (2005). 750 PMA tak bayar pajak. Perpustakaan Bappenas.
Braithwaite, V., & Wenzel, M. (2008). Integrating explanations of tax evasion and avoidance. Dalam A. E. Lewis (Penyunting), The Cambridge Handbook (pp. 304-331). Cambridge University Press.
Cooper, G. (2001). International experience with general anti-avoidance rules. SMU Law Review, 54(1), 83−130. https://scholar.smu.edu/ smulr/vol54/iss1/7
Christensen, J., & Murphy, R. (2004). The social irresponsibility of corporate tax avoidance: Taking CSR to the bottom line. Development, 47(3), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1100066
Creswell, J. (2014). Research design : Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
Ernst & Young. (Februari 2013). GAAR rising. Ernst & Young. https://www.sataxguide.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/GAAR-rising-Mapping-tax-enforcement%E2%80%99s-evolution-February-2013.pdf
Fionasari, D. (2020). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penghindaran Pajak pada Perusahaan Pertambangan Di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) Tahun 2016-2018. Jurnal IAKP: Jurnal Inovasi Akuntansi Keuangan & Perpajakan, 1(1), 28.
Freedman, J. (2014). Designing a general anti-abuse rule : Striking a balance. Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin, 20(3), 167-173.
Gamannossi, D., & Rablen, M. D. (2017). Income tax avoidance and evasion: A narrow bracketing approach. Public Finance Review, 45(6), 815-837. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142116676362
Hardiyanto, I. (2013). Permasalahan transfer pricing dalam undang-undang pajak di Indonesia. Encephale, 53(1), 59-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2012.03.001
Hoffman, W. (1961). The theory of tax planning. The Accounting Review, 36(2), 274-281. https://www.jstor.org/stable/243232
International Fiscal Association. (2018). Cahiers de droit fiscal international: Anti-avoidance measures of general nature and scope-GAAR and other rules. International Fiscal Association.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2019). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Corporate Governance: Values, Ethics and Leadership, 77-132. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.94043
Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (n.d.). Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat. Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/publikasi/ laporan/laporan-keuangan-pemerintah-pusat/
Makale, H. (2017). General rule of burden of proof : Comparative analysis of Turkish and German tax law. 7(2), 105-118.
Nagato, T. (2017). A General Anti-Avoidance Rule ( GAAR ) and the rule of law. Public Policy Review, 13(1), 35-70.
OECD. (2018). Observatory on the protection of taxpayers’ rights general report on the protection of taxpayers’ rights. April, 106. https://www.ibfd.org/sites/ ibfd.org/files/ content/pdf/OPTR_General-Report.pdf
Ogazon, L., & Hamzaoui, R. (2015). Common strategies againts tax avoidance: A global overview. Dalam M.Cotrut (Penyunting), International tax structure in the BEPS era: An analysis of anti-abuse measures (pp. 3-42). IBFD.
Onu, D., Oats, L., Kirchler, E., & Hartmann, A. J. (2019). Gaming the system : An investigation of small tax planning, and tax evasion. MDPI, 10(46), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/g10040046.
Pejovic, C. (2001). Civil law and common law: Two different paths leading to the same goal. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 32(3), 817-. https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v32i3.5873
Prebble. (2010). Does the use of GAAR to combat tax avoidance breach principles of the rule of law? a comparative study. Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper, 55(1), 21-46.
Putra, P., Syah, D., & Sriwedari. (2018). Tax avoidance: Evidence as a proof of agency theory and tax planning. International Journal of Research & Review, 5(9), 52-60.
Putra, P., Syah, D., & Simatupang, B. (2019). Institutional ownership and tax avoidance: A review agency theory. EAI. AISTSSE 2018. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-10-2018.2287316
Ratnawati, V., Azhari, S., Freddy, D., & Wahyuni, N. (2018). The impact of institutional ownership and a firm’s size on firm value: Tax avoidance as a moderating variable. Journal of Finance and Banking Review, 3(1), 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.35609/jfbr.2018.3.1(1)
Ross, S. A. (1973). The economic the theory of agency. The American Economic Review, 63(2), 134-139. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1817064
Republik Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 36 Tahun 2008 tentang Pajak Penghasilan. Sekretariat Negara.
Republik Indonesia. (2011). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Sekretariat Negara.
Sandmo, A. (2005). The theory of tax evasion: a restrospective view. National Tax Journal, 58(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2005.4.02
Satyadini, A.E., Erlangga, R.R., VDKG, Brigitta Steffi. (2019). Who Avoidas Taxes? An Empirical Evidence From The Case of Indonesia. Scientax, 1-26.
Stiglitz, J.E. (1986). The general theory of tax avoidance. NBER Working Paper, 1868. https://doi.org/ 10.3386/w1868
Suryani, N. E., & Devos, K. (2016). The proposed design of an Indonesian general anti-avoidance rule. World Applied Sciences Journal, 34(12), 1783-1789. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2016.1783.1789
United Nations. (2017). Protecting the Tax Base. United Nations.
Van de Vijver, A., Cassimon, D., & Engelen, P. J. (2020). A real option approach to sustainable corporate tax behavior. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(13), 1-17.
Waerzeggers, C., & Hillier, C. (2016). Introducing a General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) : ensuring that a GAAR achieves its purpose. Tax Law IMF Technival Note, 01.
Wahyudi, U., & Prawestri, H. P. (2006). Implikasi struktur kepemilikan terhadap nilai perusahaan: dengan keputusan keuangan sebagai variabel intervening. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi (SNA) IX Padang. Padang.
Wang, F., Xu, S., Sun, J., & Cullinan, C. P. (2020). Corporate tax avoidance: a literature review and research agenda. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(4), 793-811. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12347
Wijaya, S., & Kusumaningtyas, D. S. (2020). Analyzing and formulating a statutory General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 15(1), 35-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.24843/JIAB.2020.v15.i01.p04
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish their articles in Jurnal Sistem Informasi, Keuangan, Auditing & Perpajakan (SIKAP) agree to the following terms:
(1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internasional (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
(2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
(3) The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
