FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI OPINI AUDIT GOING CONCERN

Lucky Nugroho, Siti Nurrohmah, Lawe Anasta

Abstract


Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh financial distress, profitabilitas, leverage, likuiditas dan ukuran perusahaan pada opini audit going concern. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) dengan melakukan akses pada situs www.idx.co.id. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) periode 2012-2016. Jumlah perusahaan manufaktur yang dijadikan sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah 78 perusahaan dengan pengamatan selama 6 tahun. Berdasarkan metode purposive sampling, total sampel penelitian adalah 390 sampel. Pengujian hipotesis dalam penelitian ini menggunakan analisis regresi logistik. Hasil Financial Distress berpengaruh negatif pada opini audit going concern, leverage berpengaruh negatif terhadap opini audit going concern, sedangkan profitabilitas, likuiditas dan ukuran perusahaan  tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap opini audit going concern.


Keywords


Financial Distress; Profitabilitas; Leverage; Likuiditas; Ukuran Perusahaan; Going Concern

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alamanda, Putri Karina. 2013. “Pengaruh ukuran perusahaan, Profitabilitas, Solvabilitas, dan Debt Default terhadap penerimaan opini audit going concern pada perusahaan Manufaktur yang terdapat di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2009 – 2013”. Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Altman, E. I. (2000). Predicting financial distress of companies: revisiting the Z-score and ZETA models. Stern School of Business, New York University, 9-12.

Altman, E. I. (2013). 17 Predicting financial distress of companies: revisiting the Z-Score and ZETA® models1. Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Empirical Finance, 428.

Antle, R., Gordon, E., Narayanamoorthy, G., & Zhou, L. (2006). The joint determination of audit fees, non-audit fees, and abnormal accruals. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 27(3), 235-266.

Asker, J., Farre-Mensa, J., & Ljungqvist, A. (2011). Comparing the investment behavior of public and private firms (No. w17394). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Barclay, M. J., Smith, C. W., & Watts, R. L. (1995). The determinants of corporate leverage and dividend policies. Journal of applied corporate finance, 7(4), 4-19

Barnes, P., & HUAN, H. D. (1993). The auditor's going concern decision: some UK evidence concerning independence and competence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 20(2), 213-228.

Blay, A. D., Geiger, M. A., & North, D. S. (2011). The auditor's going-concern opinion as a communication of risk. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 77-102.

Boritz, J. E., & Kralitz, E. R. (1987). Reporting on condition: auditing the going-concern assumption. CA Magazine, 120(3), 67-70.

Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. (2003). Audit committee characteristics and auditor dismissals following “new” going-concern reports. The Accounting Review, 78(1), 95-117.

Chen, C. R., & Steiner, T. L. (1999). Managerial ownership and agency conflicts: A nonlinear simultaneous equation analysis of managerial ownership, risk taking, debt policy, and dividend policy. Financial review, 34(1), 119-136.

Chow, C. (1982), “The demand for external auditing: size, debt and ownership influence”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 57 No. 2, pp. 272-91

Cremonini, M., & Martini, P. (2005). Evaluating information security investments from attackers perspective: the return-on-attack (ROA). In WEIS

DeFond, M. L., Raghunandan, K., & Subramanyam, K. R. (2002). Do non–audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of accounting research, 40(4), 1247-1274.

Dewayanto, T. (2011). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Fokus Ekonomi, 6(1).

Dwirainaningsih, Y. (2017). Pengaruh upah minimum terhadap penyerapan tenaga kerja dan kesejahteraan masyarakat di Kota Pekalongan. JURNAL LITBANG KOTA PEKALONGAN, 12.

Erik, N. (2016). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Manajemen Laba Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Koefisien Respon Laba. Sistem Informasi Akuntansi, Keuangan, Auditing & Perpajakan (SIKAP), 1 (1), 9–21.

Fayed, M. E. (2013). Comparative performance study of conventional and Islamic banking in Egypt. Journal of Applied Finance and Banking, 3(2), 1.

Feldmann, D., & Read, W. J. (2013). Going-concern audit opinions for bankrupt companies–impact of credit rating. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(4), 345-363.

Gallizo, J. L., & Saladrigues, R. (2016). An analysis of determinants of going concern audit opinion: Evidence from Spain stock exchange. Intangible Capital, 12(1).

Geiger, M. A., & Rama, D. V. (2006). Audit firm size and going-concern reporting accuracy. Accounting horizons, 20(1), 1-17.

Ghazali, I. (2013). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 21 Update PLS Regresi. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Habib, A., Uddin Bhuiyan, B., & Islam, A. (2013). Financial distress, earnings management and market pricing of accruals during the global financial crisis. Managerial Finance, 39(2), 155-180.

Hall, M., & Weiss, L. (1967). Firm size and profitability. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 319-331.

Humphery-Jenner, M. L., & Powell, R. G. (2011). Firm size, takeover profitability, and the effectiveness of the market for corporate control: Does the absence of anti-takeover provisions make a difference?. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(3), 418-437.

Januarti, I. (2008). Analisis Rasio Keuangan dan Rasio Non Keuangan yang Mempengaruhi Auditor dalam Memberikan Opini Audit Going Concern pada Auditee (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEJ tahun 2000-2005). MAKSI, 8.

Jawadi, F., Jawadi, N., & Louhichi, W. (2014). Conventional and Islamic stock price performance: An empirical investigation. International Economics, 137, 73-87.

Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976), “Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 305-60.

Joh, S. W. (2003). Corporate governance and firm profitability: evidence from Korea before the economic crisis. Journal of financial Economics, 68(2), 287-322.

Kartika, A. (2012). Pengaruh Kondisi Keuangan dan Non Keuangan Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Going Concern Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di BEI. Dinamika Akuntansi Keuangan dan Perbankan, 1(1).

Kristiana, I. (2012). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Profitabilitas, Likuiditas, Pertumbuhanperusahaan Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). Berkala Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi, 1(1).

Kuruppu, N., Laswad, F., & Oyelere, P. (2003). The efficacy of liquidation and bankruptcy prediction models for assessing going concern. Managerial auditing journal, 18(6/7), 577-590.

Lall, S. (2000). The Technological structure and performance of developing country manufactured exports, 1985‐98. Oxford development studies, 28(3), 337-369.

Lie, C., Wardani, R. P., & Pikir, T. W. (2016). Pengaruh Likuiditas, Solvabilitas, Profitabilitas, dan Rencana Manajemen terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern (Studi Empiris Perusahaan Manufaktur di BEI). Berkala Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 1(2).

Mirza, D. S. (2012). Pengaruh kemiskinan, pertumbuhan ekonomi, dan belanja modal terhadap indeks pembangunan manusia di Jawa Tengah tahun 2006-2009. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 1(2).

Mutchler, J.F. (1984), “Auditors’ perceptions on the going-concern opinion decision”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 3, pp. 17-30.

Moalla, H. (2017). Audit report qualification/modification: Impact of financial variables in Tunisia. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 7(4), 468-485.

Ogunlana, S. O., Promkuntong, K., & Jearkjirm, V. (1996). Construction delays in a fast-growing economy: comparing Thailand with other economies. International Journal of project management, 14(1), 37-45.

Olson, D., & Zoubi, T. (2016). Convergence in bank performance for commercial and Islamic banks during and after the Global Financial Crisis. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance.

Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization studies, 24(3), 403-441.

Pan, W. T. (2012). A new fruit fly optimization algorithm: taking the financial distress model as an example. Knowledge-Based Systems, 26, 69-74.

Prasetyo, R. B., & Firdaus, M. (2009). Pengaruh infrastruktur pada pertumbuhan ekonomi wilayah di indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pembangunan, 2(2), 222-236.

Rakhiemah, A. N., & Agustia, D. (2009). Pengaruh kinerja lingkungan terhadap corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure dan kinerja finansial perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XII, 4-6.

Rampini, A. A., & Viswanathan, S. (2010). Collateral, risk management, and the distribution of debt capacity. The Journal of Finance, 65(6), 2293-2322.

Salawu, R., Moromoke Oladejo, T., & Godwin, I. (2017). Going Concern and Audit Opinion of Nigerian Banking Industry.

Santosa, A. F., & Wedari, L. K. (2007). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kecenderungan Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 11(2).

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1992). Liquidation values and debt capacity: A market equilibrium approach. The Journal of Finance, 47(4), 1343-1366

Sinarwati, N. K. (2011). MENGAPA PERUSAHAAN MENERIMA OPINI AUDIT GOING CONCERN?. JINAH (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Humanika), 1(1).

Stanley, J., Todd De Zoort, F., & Taylor, G. (2009). The association between insider trading surrounding going concern audit opinions and future bankruptcy. Managerial Auditing Journal, 24(3), 290-312.

Susanto, Y. K. (2009). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penerimaan opini audit going concern pada perusahaan publik sektor manufaktur. Jurnal bisnis dan Akuntansi, 11(3), 155-173.

Svanberg, J., & Ohman, P. (2014). Lost revenues associated with going concern modified opinions in the Swedish audit market. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 15(2), 197-214.

Tria, N. N. A. (2015). Pengaruh ukuran perushaan, profitabilitas, solvabilitas dan debt default terhadap penerimaan opini audit going concern pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) Periode 2009-2013. Jurnal Akintansi UNESA, 3(2).

Venuti, E. K. (2004). The going-concern assumption revisited: Assessing a company's future viability. The CPA Journal, 74(5), 40.

Vermeer, T. E., Raghunandan, K., & Forgione, D. A. (2013). Going-concern modified audit opinions for non-profit organizations. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 25(1), 113-134.

Watts, R. and Zimmerman, J. (1986), Positive Accounting Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Welch, I. (2011). Two common problems in capital structure research: The financial‐debt‐to‐asset ratio and issuing activity versus leverage changes. International Review of Finance, 11(1), 1-17.

Willenborg, M., & McKeown, J. C. (2000). Going-concern initial public offerings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3), 279-313.

Wulandari, S. (2014). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Auditor dalam Memberikan Opini Audit Going Concern. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 531-558.

Yamin, M., & Windymadaksa, S. (2017). PEMBANGUNAN KERETA CEPAT JAKARTA-BANDUNG SEBAGAI MERCUSUAR HUBUNGAN INDONESIA-TIONGKOK. JPP (Jurnal Politik Profetik), 5(2), 200-218.

Yong Tan, Christos Floros, and John Anchor. "The profitability of Chinese banks: impacts of risk, competition and efficiency." Review of Accounting and Finance 16, no. 1 (2017): 86-105.

Yusuf, A. M. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif & Penelitian Gabungan. Prenada Media.

Zmijewski, M. E. (1984). Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting research, 59-82. Available online at: http://investasi.kontan.co.id/news/bei-kaji-kembali-penilaian-going-concern-emiten

www.idx.co.id, diakses sabtu 16 September 2017.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32897/jsikap.v2i2.79

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Sistem Informasi, Keuangan, Auditing & Perpajakan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Published by:

Program Studi Akuntansi  
Fakultas Ekonomi
Universitas Sangg Buana
Bandung, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
p-ISSN: 2541-1691 e-ISSN: 2599-1876

Creative Commons License
Jurnal SIKAP by Program Studi Akuntansi licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats